The Old Perspective on Paul and Racial Reconciliation

In 16th century Germany, an Augustinian monk by the name of Martin Luther made a theological discovery that would shake both Rome and Europe and gave birth to the Protestant Reformation. 

Luther had discovered that “God’s righteousness meant not ‘the righteousness by which he is righteous in himself but the righteousness by which we are made righteous by God’ (Douglas Moo, Romans, p. 71).  You see, for Luther and the other Reformers justification by faith, “How can a sinful person be made right with God?”, was at the center of their theology and their fight against Rome and its works-based salvation.

But what if Luther’s sixteenth century Europe had looked like the 50s and 60s in North America, the times of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., the Civil Rights Movement and the racial problems?

Lightfoot Professor Emeritus of Divinity at the University of Durham, England, James D.G. Dunn has a take on the matter:

One cannot help wondering whether European history over the last century might not have been radically different, particulary if Lutheran Germany had been able to keep more fully alive that understanding of justification by faith [“God accepts persons withouth reference to whether they have been born into a particular race, or not (Romans 9:6-8)”].  And an invaluable weapon against apartheid has also been too much lost sight of in South Africa, another country which prides itself in its biblical heritage and its Reformation roots.  Not that Anglo-Saxon Britain and North American can afford to strike judgmental postures on this subject, given the tendency of so many churches in affluent countries to identify Christian civilization with, for example, Victorian culture or American way of life.  Justification by faith is a banner raised by Paul against any and all such presumption of privileged status before God by virtue of race, culture or nationality, against any and all attempts to preserve such spurious distinctions by practices that exclude and divide.  (The New Perspective on Paul, revised edition, p. 205, emphasis added)

Not to trivalize Martin Luther’s discovery, one I’m sure that was necessary at the time, but it was not fully developed in light of all that Paul wrote about justification by faith.

For Paul, justification by faith also had to deal with the racial reconciliation of both Christian Jews and Christian Gentiles in the Body of Christ, the One New Humanity (Eph. 2:11-21; Gal. 2:11-21), which is at the heart of the gospel, as Paul understood it (Romans 1:1-7; 15).

But Martin Luther, the Reformation, most of Christendom, and the Old Perspective on Paul have missed this crucial aspect of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

There simply can be no true and complete announcement of the gospel of Jesus Christ when we continue to “exclude and divide” along racial and ethnic lines (Gal. 2:11-14; 3:7-14).

This entry was posted in Church History, James D.G. Dunn, Jews, Justification, Martin Luther, New Perspective on Paul, Pauline, Reformation, Salvation and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The Old Perspective on Paul and Racial Reconciliation

  1. Iris says:

    Well stated. Simply put: there is no race in Christ – just those born of Him and those not yet born in Him. No other distinction exists. Gal.3:28

  2. T.C. R says:

    Gal. 3:28 is crucial to the gospel-vision.

  3. Tim Worley says:

    I agree that this is one area where NPP exponents have certainly touched on something underemphasized historically. However, I’m not sure whether it’s necessarily an OPP vs. NPP issue or not. I think even an Old Perspective reader of Ephesians would have to come to the same conclusions. Now, in Romans and Galatians, I certainly see how a NPP reading may emphasize those things that are already in Ephesians (and Luke-Acts, and elsewhere).

  4. T.C. R says:

    Yes, this aspect is the genius of the NPP. The OPP reader may have seen this aspect, but his focus was certainly elsewhere.

    Now to really do justice to Luke-Acts, this ecclesial inclusion must be emphasized.

  5. SteveL says:

    Hmm…so this means non-American believers have to love/respect American believers??? ! 🙂 😉

  6. T.C. R says:

    You got it! 😉

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s