5 Ways to Improve Our Observance of the Lord’s Supper

CommunionBreadWineIn Taking God Seriously (see my review here) noted theologian J.I. Packer has a chapter titled “Taking the Lord’s Supper Seriously.”  After saying things like “we are really more interested in the sermon than in the sacrament” and “We feel the sermon is more important, we expect more from it…,” Packer then asks, “Why do Protestants thus dumb down the Supper?  Why do we take for granted, as we seem to do, that it is of secondary and minor importance?”

What Packer is lamenting here is something I’ve become all too familiar with over the years, including recently.  With this in mind, I wish to suggest 5 ways we may improve our observance of the Lord’s Supper.

1. We Need to Understand the Lord’s Supper as a Covenant Meal, that is, the covenant meal of the New Covenant.  We find this explicitly stated in the Synoptic Gospels (Matt. 26:28; Mark 14:24 and Luke 22:20) and Paul’s reiteration of the words of institution (1 Cor. 11:25).  We may then explore it as a covenant meal in the larger context of Scripture (see my post here).  In the Supper, we remember the Lord’s covenant pledge to us.

2. We Need to Understand the Lord’s Supper as Both Sacrament and Ordinance.  I know some tend to avoid the term “sacrament.”  But this is more reactionary than anything, which is unfortunate.  However a proper understanding of the term “sacrament” will only prove helpful as we rethink and seek to improve our observance.  Sacrament is from the Latin sacramentum, meaning a soldier’s sacred oath of allegiance.  And when we say “ordinance,” it simply means that it was ordained by the Lord.  With the help of Louis Berkhof, when correctly understood “A sacrament is a holy ordinance instituted by Christ, in which by sensible signs the grace of God in Christ, and the benefits of the covenant of grace, are represented, sealed, and applied to believers, and these, in turn, give expression to their faith and allegiance to God” (Systematic Theology).

3.  We Need to Understand the Lord’s Supper as Holy Communion.  “Communion” is the King James Version of the Bible translation of the Greek koinonia in 1 Corinthians 10:16, but which is rendered “participation” modern Bible translation like the NIV and ESV.  So when we come to the Lord’s Table, bless the cup and the bread, thus making them “holy,” we are, as Paul says, communing “in the blood of Christ” and “in the body of Christ.”

There is no need to minimize the weight of Paul’s words as is often the case.  When by faith we eat the bread and drink the cup, we are communing “in the blood of Christ” and “in the body of Christ.”  This we do by faith.

4.  We Need to Understand the Lord’s Supper as a Bond of Love.  As believers, when we come to the Lord’s Table, we must come as one, not individually, but as one: “Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread” (10:17).  It was precisely because the Corinthians believers had forgotten this aspect of coming to the Lord’s Table, why there were divisions among them, thus making the Lord’s Supper a thing of contempt.  Paul had to correct their practice.  He could not commend them (1 Corinthians 11:17-22).

Perhaps we can strive to be creative in our observance of the Lord’s Supper to capture visibly this oneness, this unity, of which Paul speaks.  This may be done by each participant taking the elements together.

5.  We need to Understand the Lord’s Supper as a Time of Self-Examination.  We examine ourselves not to see how worthy we are.  Rather, we examine ourselves to see whether or not we are observing the bread and the cup in a worthy manner, lest we eat and drink judgment on ourselves for a failure to discern properly the Lord’s body (see my reflections on what I believe this self-examination entails here).  In other words, the Lord’s Supper is a time not to think about what we do for the Lord but what we receive from the Lord, by faith.

Conclusion.  As the body of Christ, we cannot not take the Lord’s Supper seriously, to echo J.I. Packer.  We must continue to rethink our observance of the Supper–the New Covenant Meal, which the Lord has instituted and ordained for us to celebrate as a memorial of himself and a proclamation of his death until he comes.

This entry was posted in Communion, J.I. Packer, Lord's Supper, Louis Berkhof, Passover and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to 5 Ways to Improve Our Observance of the Lord’s Supper

  1. Colin Heath says:

    Amen to that. A worthy summary and a good take off for a sermon one day perhaps!

    I do like your point 4. I agree that what in the UK is the largely Baptist practice of taking together gives a strong picture. Most non episcopals here use individual cups for wine but not necessarily taking together. That said I do like our own practice of gathering around the Table together in common need and gratitude. My Baptist minister brother once said he liked the symbolism of the common loaf and the common cup. As a minor foornote , as one who suffers from Essential Tremor, I do have serious practical difficulty when faced with those little thimbles.

    You also remind me of a book I read many years ago setting our how Cranmer arrived at the Prayer Book of 1552, which in due course with modest changes became the BCP. The author suggested that in the structure and practice of the Supper, he set aside the Mass and restored the Communion, or coming together, of the faithful. He did not support the idea of private celebrations by the Presbyter alone.

    • TC says:

      Colin, within the last few years, I’ve found myself devoting a lot of time rethinking our observance of the Lord’s Supper. I’m particularly drawn to it. Yes, I would love for someone to preach and develop these points more, for the edification of the Lord’s people.

      I’m certainly encouraged by the practices you shared. Thanks. Cranmer was onto something. 😉

  2. Lon says:

    Excellent! Your #2 – understand the meal as a covenant meal has been growing in importance to me over the last few years. I can’t get away from the words, “This is the blood of the new covenant given for you.” The focus of the meal is the promise of this covenant, i.e. Jesus living and dying on our behalf so that we might belong to God as His beloved children through him. It’s a sign of the good news, after all.

    Thanks for sharing this. (I gotta get that book!)

  3. john.radcliffe@manx.net says:

    As regards #4, I like the practice of our current minister. While the bread and cup (actually small glasses) are distributed to the congregation individually, they are encouraged to retain the bread so that we can all eat together, but to drink the cup individually – thereby allowing the expression of both the corporate and individual nature of salvation in the one ceremony.

    • TC says:

      Yes, I have done it that way before. At other times, I have congregants dip the bread in the cup and we all partake together.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s