A Pastoral Letter from Conservative Members of Presbyterian Church (USA)

The Presbyterian Church (USA) has been dominating the news when the 221st Presbyterian Church (USA) General Assembly voted to allow their pastors to perform gay marriage in states where it is legally recognized.

In response, “A conservative group within Presbyterian Church (USA) has stated its members ‘grieve’ the General Assembly’s vote that allows pastors to perform same-sex marriages”:

Dear Sisters and Brothers in Christ,

Meeting in Detroit, our 221st General Assembly has taken two significant actions on the teaching and practice of marriage according to the PC(USA)’s Book of Order. First, the GA approved an Authoritative Interpretation (AI) that now permits PC(USA) pastors to conduct same-sex weddings, and allows sessions to approve the use of church property for such ceremonies. Secondly, the GA approved a proposed amendment to the Book of Order that would replace current language with a description of marriage as a relationship between “two people, traditionally a man and a woman.”

While the AI goes into effect immediately, the proposed amendment requires ratification by a majority of the presbyteries before any change could be made, a process that takes about one year. Both measures are designed to allow pastors and congregations to participate in same-sex weddings, in states where gay marriage is legal.

We grieve these actions by the General Assembly. We believe we will look back on this day and see the error of these decisions. But an Assembly of our denomination has spoken, and now we must move ahead without compromising compassion or conviction.

It is extremely important to understand that while the AI and the constitutional amendment broaden the denomination’s interpretation of marriage, they do not require any pastor to officiate or any session to authorize the use of church property for a marriage service with which they disagree. It remains up to each pastor and each session to determine what is and is not appropriate for their congregation.

Proponents of these two actions have made great effort to invite and welcome those who hold unwaveringly to a traditional interpretation of marriage to remain engaged in the mission and ministry of the PC(USA) with full integrity. Some will resolve to do this—others may not. Those of us who do remain in the PC(USA) will, no doubt, encounter other decisions and actions with which we will disagree. We are not here to fight and divide, but to continue to proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ and to testify to the transforming power of his love that is available to everyone. We urge you in the strongest possible way to refrain from actions, attitudes, and language that would mar the image of Christ in your response to the Assembly’s actions.

Let us commit to one another, and to Almighty God, that we will seek to embody the grace and love of our Savior across our theological differences, and in personal and congregational deliberations about our future in the PC(USA).  Source

While they may not be of our own denominations, these conservative members of the Presbyterian Church (USA) are in need of our prayers, as they “grieve” their own denominations actions and as they seek to move forward.

This entry was posted in Presbyterian Church (US), Same-sex Marriage and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to A Pastoral Letter from Conservative Members of Presbyterian Church (USA)

  1. Lon says:

    Thanks for sharing.

  2. Coliin Heath says:

    From my side of the pond, thislooks like a very restrained, prayerful,, loving and measured response to votes which cause much grief and pain. I pray that supporters of the vote will meet in kind.

  3. Mark Stevens says:

    I’ve always wondered what I would do. leave or stay. I’d hate to create division but could I stay with integrity? much to ponder.

  4. Jon Hughes says:


    What strikes me as interesting here is that they’ve voted to allow their pastors to perform gay marriages “in states where it is legally recognized”. This is hardly subversive Christianity, but rather a case of the church following the lead of the world, and ‘catching up with the times’.

    It would be far more impressive (agree or disagree with the principle) if they were to do the same in states where it is NOT legally recognized. That would be evidence of real conviction regardless of the consequences, and one that sets the agenda for the world rather than the reverse. But this is plainly not the case, and I find that telling.

    Rather than something to be applauded, this is another example of weak, insipid, follow-the-lead-of-the-secular-authorities Christianity that any outside observer would regard as irrelevant, because they are merely following a pre-set agenda rather than standing for truth against the prevailing mood.

    • TC Robinson says:

      Jon, great observation. Yes, it does appear to simply be going with the flow rather than setting the agenda, whether we agree with them or not. Perhaps they deemed it best to go with the flow, as each state allows, which really is a matter of time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s